NetBSD with git so far
- tech-repository
- cvs-migration
- github
- 2011-10: Fossilizing NetBSD: The road to modern version control
- 2015-01: Core statement on version control systems
- 2017-06: New home for the repository conversion
- 2017-09: pkgsrc Commit Message Policy
- GitHub.com/NetBSD
Low memory hosts:
git appears to have slightly different memory characteristics depending on the protocol used. Over http I am able to get a full clone with all history on a 256 + 256 raspberri pi. If you bump up the memory to 512 + 256 it makes ssh possible, which means writes are possible.
The link above has some tuning I used to get memory requirements way down.
It should be noted that git support a "shallow" clone (--depth 1) which ignores most history but allows commits and full development. A shallow clone works on very small systems; I would guess 128MB + a little swap is enough.
git is slow during 'status' by default since it searches the entire tree for a change. It will produce a warning with tunable options if the command runs slowly.
Update
After some complaining on the git@ mailing list a patch has been produced which drops the memory requirements down quite a bit. I can now, without much tuning, work on my 512 system.
CVS in parallel
I do not think this is a good idea and do not plan to advocate for it. Git does have a cvs server built-in but I have not taken the time to set it up for testing because it is slightly involved and I don't see the purpose.
Conversion
One-shot to create the new True Source. I don't think there will be many cvs hold-outs.
See above for CVS server provided if ongoing conversion is really desired.
existing cvs dependencies & server setup
is there a list of these? build systems? The entire build infrastructure of NetBSD should (even without git) change into a "jobs"-oriented workflow instead of a "server"-oriented workflow.
Very recent (summer 2017) events have shown that the ability to move things around is very important.
ivanova (cvs.netbsd.org) will become git.netbsd.org already for pkgsrc. Our restricted shell has a hook for git* commands to be passed to git-shell.
How should NetBSD be setup
High level- private box for write master using ssh, any number of additional systems with read-only mirrors over http:// and git://
Also see a great description of how DragonflyBSD is setup:
dfbsd server setup
dfbsd workflows
dfbsd config
In 2019, FreeBSD core team has appointed a WG to explore transition from Subversion to Git.
FreeBSD has moved to git More FreeBSD git docs
how to install
git should fit into NetBSD src/tools easily. I have not personally tested cross compilation.
workflows
See DragonflyBSD examples given above
There are many many workflows supported in git. For the most part I think NetBSD developers would follow the "feature branch" workflow from the main repo (or private/semi-private clones before merge).
Public collaboration is a big feature of git since it can format patches into at least two different email formats and they can be submitted to a bug report or to a mailing list, which should allow clean apply.
A non-developer could also post a pull request to github or host his git repo for a friendly developer to add as an origin and pull his branch.
Pull Requests using mailing lists https://patchwork.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
(git origin add future-developer http://example.com/~greatguy/src.git)
log message formats
Try to references named branches/tags instead of sha-1's Also using the dates for commits instead of commit id's
The only rules I know about git commit messages are that the first line is treated specially insomuch that it is shown in git log --oneline
output.
Special commit messages you might have seen around "Closes CORE-1234" etc are commands being sent to commit hooks to interact with other systems (like bug trackers).
how to convert
This has been working for years.
No lock-in
I am unable to anticipate the next generation of SCM. Don't do anything weird like change history and we should be fine.
Maybe when we have 30 years of project history it will be time to consider restructuring the project.
git is the most widely used VCS ever so it has the best chance of conversion tools existing. No future tool will be able to exist without a git-conversion script.
I think this is less a function of the tool and more a function of the project not allowing non-"standard" actions.
Who, When, and How Long?
- ESR/IIJ/Joerg - convert
- sometime, eventually, maybe
- assumptions/proposal:
Assuming conversion starting from date(x) to freeze(y) is relatively easy, the refinements of Joerg/ESR conversion can continue to run in read-only mode as they do today. This means the "switch" is a few hours only for:
- cvs goes read only
- history from last git conversion pull until now is appended
- cvs is turned off
- git is made available over ssh
future considerations, internal tooling, & misc
ikiwiki's main backend is git so wikisrc and pkgsrc.org websites are better as git repos.
[RCS Id and more)[https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Attributes#Keyword-Expansion] addresses RDS Id expansion specifically but consider not doing this in a 1:1 way in the future. These problems are likely solved by DragonflyBSD or FreeBSD already.
Very few systems should be relying on CVS internals and should, generally, be able to replace a cvs checkout
with git clone
and that will be the extent of it. It's not a major concern but can't be done until decisions are made.
Addressing specific workflow concerns
The ability for CVS to checkout subdirectories appears to be a frequently requested feature. Git provides a way to do this using sparse checkouts. Let's demonstrate another neat feature worktrees so we can have multiple parallel branches checked out of /bin/sh
doing parallel development of a specific tool efficiently. Repeat this into as many worktrees as you want.
cd netbsd.git #my clone
#make a new worktree and branch named new2
git worktree add -b new2 --no-checkout ../new2
cd ../new2 #only contains a .git/ dir
#--no-cone avoids grabbing top-level files
git sparse-checkout set --no-cone bin/sh
#check on things
git sparse-checkout list
#output
# bin/sh
#get the files
git checkout new2
#did it work?
find ./ -type d
./
./bin
./bin/sh
./bin/sh/funcs
./bin/sh/USD.doc
./bin/sh/bltin
git status
On branch new3
You are in a sparse checkout with 1% of tracked files present.
nothing to commit, working tree clean