Programmatic interfaces in the system (at various levels) are currently specified in C: functions are declared with C prototypes, constants with C preprocessor macros, etc. While this is a reasonable choice for a project written in C, and good enough for most general programming, it falls down on some points, especially for published/supported interfaces. The system call interface is the most prominent such interface, and the one where these issues are most visible; however, other more internal interfaces are also candidates.

Declaring these interfaces in some other form, presumably some kind of interface description language intended for the purpose, and then generating the corresponding C declarations from that form, solves some of these problems. The goal of this project is to investigate the costs and benefits of this scheme, and various possible ways to pursue it sanely, and produce a proof-of-concept implementation for a selected interface that solves a real problem.

Note that as of this writing many candidate internal interfaces do not really exist in practice or are not adequately structured enough to support this treatment.

Problems that have been observed include:

The project requires: (1) choose a target interface and problem; (2) evaluate existing IDLs (there are many) for suitability; (3) choose one, as roll your own should be only a last resort; (4) prepare a definition for the target interface in your selected IDL; (5) implement the code generator to produce the corresponding C declarations; (6) integrate the code generator and its output into the system (this should require minimal changes); (7) implement the code generator and other material to solve your target problem.

Note that while points 5, 6, and 7 are a reasonably simple matter of programming, parts 1-3 and possibly 4 constitute research -- these parts are as important as the code is, maybe more so, and doing them well is critical to success.

The IDL chosen should if at all possible be suitable for repeating steps 4-7 for additional choices of target interface and problem, as there are a lot of such choices and many of them are probably worth pursuing in the long run.

Some things to be aware of:

Note: the purpose of an IDL is not to encode a parsing of what are otherwise C-language declarations. The purpose of an IDL is to encode some information about the semantics of an interface. Parsing the input is the easy part of the problem. For this reason, proposals that merely suggest replacing C declarations with e.g. equivalent XML or JSON blobs are unlikely to be accepted.

(Also note that XML-based IDLs are unlikely to be accepted by the community as XML is not in general considered suitable as a source language.)

Add a comment
Contact | Disclaimer | Copyright © 1994-2017 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
NetBSD® is a registered trademark of The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.