version 1.7, 2019/08/29 21:57:38
|
version 1.12, 2019/09/15 12:56:38
|
Line 1
|
Line 1
|
# Various GCC/vax issues and invesigation # |
# Various GCC/vax issues and invesigation # |
|
|
## libgomp crash with -O2 ## |
[WIP tree](gcc-mirror/) |
|
|
|
## libgomp crash with -O2 [#58901](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901) ## |
Repro: |
Repro: |
|
|
#!/bin/sh |
#!/bin/sh |
Line 22 NetBSD avoids it with a [local diff](htt
|
Line 24 NetBSD avoids it with a [local diff](htt
|
It looks like a real bug in vax_legitimate_address_p not handling some addressing modes. |
It looks like a real bug in vax_legitimate_address_p not handling some addressing modes. |
The code to handle offset(reg)[index] might be off: it doesn't like if neither xfoo0, xfoo1 are constant. |
The code to handle offset(reg)[index] might be off: it doesn't like if neither xfoo0, xfoo1 are constant. |
|
|
|
|
|
## change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2286 [#85152](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85152) ## |
|
|
|
Repro: |
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh |
|
|
|
cat << EOF > oacc.i |
|
void fn2(); |
|
unsigned a; |
|
int fn1() { |
|
int b = a >> 16; |
|
if (b) |
|
fn2(); |
|
} |
|
EOF |
|
vax--netbsdelf-gcc -O2 -c oacc.i |
|
|
## unrecognizable insn with any optimization ## |
## unrecognizable insn with any optimization ## |
|
|
Repro: |
Repro: |
Line 64 This errors out with:
|
Line 84 This errors out with:
|
during RTL pass: vregs |
during RTL pass: vregs |
/home/fly/oacc/decl.ii:17:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 |
/home/fly/oacc/decl.ii:17:1: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2310 |
|
|
Providing a trivial scheduling will avoid subregs of mem. |
|
|
This is in VAX-specific code. We need to figure out what instruction pattern this is, that we're missing. |
|
|
|
<!--Providing a trivial scheduling will avoid subregs of mem. |
|
However, this doesn't work for us. Our crash and mem subregs happen at a too early pass, most likely.--> |
|
|
|
## DWARF ## |
|
|
|
flag_dwarf2_cfi_asm = 0; |
|
|
|
is kind of a big deal. We should probably get rid of it, but [binutils hates that.](https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/1df57dce3744cf4743358b098728a0658b80b8fb) |
|
|
|
ld: warning: dynamic relocation to `?' in readonly section `.eh_frame' |
|
ld: warning: dynamic relocation to `?' in readonly section `.eh_frame' |
|
ld: warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in a shared object |
|
ld: .eh_frame_hdr refers to overlapping FDEs |
|
ld: final link failed: bad value |
|
|
|
[riscv seemed to share the issue](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-binutils-gdb/issues/76) and had fixed it. |
|
|
|
## review comments ## |
|
|
|
Jeff Law [provided some feedback](https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-04/msg00281.html). More of it should be addressed. |