Diff for /wikisrc/users/haad/Attic/porting_zfs.mdwn between versions 1.6 and 1.10

version 1.6, 2009/10/26 23:19:05 version 1.10, 2009/12/24 00:16:22
Line 2 Line 2
     
 NetBSD zfs port is work in progress and can easily panic your system.  NetBSD zfs port is work in progress and can easily panic your system.
   
 **ZFS currently works ony on i386!!**  **ZFS currently works ony on i386 and amd64!!**
   
 ---  ---
 # 2. Using NetBSD ZFS port   # 2. Using NetBSD ZFS port 
Line 55  After creating ZVOLS and filesystem they Line 55  After creating ZVOLS and filesystem they
 ## Show stoppers   ## Show stoppers 
   
 ### amd64  ### amd64
 * amd64 zio_root crash  
 Investigation   
 vdev_label_read_config -> zio_root calls zio_wait on a zio_root zio_t. Later zio_execute tries to generate                        
 checksum on zio->zio_data which is NULL for a zio_root. Is this ressurrection of andys zio_null problem ?   
 because zio_root is basicaly zio_null.  
                   
  Solution  
  What is difference between i386 and amd64 version why it is working on i386 and not on a amd64 that can be  
  solution.  
 ### i386   ### i386 
   
 ### Both   ### Both 
 * vnode reclaiming deadlocks   * vnode reclaiming deadlocks 
    
  This can be fixed by deferring call to zfs_zinactive in zfs_reclaim to another system thread if lock is held.  
  But it causes deadlock and we need to investigate if it is caused by this change or by another problem.  
                           
  Deadlock backtrace is this  
                           
  VOP_WRITE->zfs_netbsd_write->zfs_write->dmu_tx_wait->txg_wait_open->cv_wait  
  txq_quisce_thread->txg_thread_wait->cv_wait  
  txg_sync_thread->spa_sync->dsl_pool_sync->zio_wait->cv_wait  
                           
  FreeBSD approach should be investigated why they are doing this differently and why it works for them. They   
  call zfs_zinactive from zfs_freebsd_inactive which is null op for NetBSD.  
                           
  zfs umount panic is caused by using FreeBSD approach in zfs_reclaim.  
   
   Current code is quite a hack but it works until I will find some time to rework vnode reclaiming on NetBSD.
   
   http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/external/cddl/osnet/dist/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c#4254
    
 * vnode fsync bug   * vnode fsync bug 
       
   I think that we are hitting this bug, too. I have some patches in the tree which fixes deadlod in vnode reclaim but after that I'm getting another deadlock in VOP_FSYNC.    I think that we are hitting this bug, too. I have some patches in the tree which fixes deadlod in vnode reclaim but after that I'm getting another deadlock in VOP_FSYNC.
Line 91  because zio_root is basicaly zio_null. Line 73  because zio_root is basicaly zio_null.
 * Snapshots  * Snapshots
 * Permissions  * Permissions
 * Old code, we should update NetBSD zfs port to new code  * Old code, we should update NetBSD zfs port to new code
 * More tasks can be found at [http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/external/cddl/osnet/TODO]  * More tasks can be found at <http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/external/cddl/osnet/TODO>
   
 # External Documentation links  # External Documentation links
 Nice zfs howto written for zfs + mac os x [http://code.google.com/p/maczfs/wiki/GettingStarted]  Nice zfs howto written for zfs + mac os x <http://code.google.com/p/maczfs/wiki/GettingStarted>

Removed from v.1.6  
changed lines
  Added in v.1.10


CVSweb for NetBSD wikisrc <wikimaster@NetBSD.org> software: FreeBSD-CVSweb