Annotation of wikisrc/projects/project/bulktracker.mdwn, revision 1.3
1.1 dholland 1: [[!template id=project
1.2 dholland 3: title="Bulk build tracker application"
1.1 dholland 4:
1.2 dholland 9: mentors="unknown"
1.1 dholland 11: category="pkgsrc"
1.2 dholland 13: duration="unknown"
1.1 dholland 14:
16: Currently, bulk build results are sent to the pkgsrc-bulk mailing
17: list. To figure out if a package is or has been building successfully,
18: or when it broke, one must wade through the list archives and search
19: the report e-mails by hand. Furthermore, to figure out what commits if
20: any were correlated with a breakage, one must wade through the
21: pkgsrc-changes archive and cross-reference manually.
23: The project is to produce a web/database application that can be run
24: from the pkgsrc releng website on NetBSD.org that tracks bulk build
25: successes and failures and provides search and crossreferencing
28: The application should subscribe to the pkgsrc-bulk and pkgsrc-changes
29: mailing lists and ingest the data it finds into a SQL database. It
30: should track commits to each package (and possibly infrastructure
31: changes that might affect all packages) on both HEAD and the current
32: stable branch, and also all successful and failed build reports on a
33: per-platform (OS and/or machine type) basis.
35: The web part of the application should be able to retrieve summaries
36: of currently broken packages, in general or for a specific platform
37: and/or specific branch. It should also be able to generate a more
38: detailed report about a single package, containing for example which
39: platforms it has been built on recently and whether it succeeded or
40: not; also, if it is broken, how long it has been broken, and the
41: history of package commits and version bumps vs. build results. There
42: will likely be other searches/reports wanted as well.
44: The application should also have an interface for people who do
45: partial or individual-package check builds; that is, it should be able
46: to generate a list of packages that have not been built since they
47: were last committed, on a given platform or possibly on a per-user
48: basis, and accept results from attempting to build these or subsets of
49: these packages. It is not entirely clear what this interface should be
50: (and e.g. whether it should be command-line-based, web-based, or what,
51: and whether it should be limited to developers) and it's reasonable to
52: expect that some refinements or rearrangements to it will be needed
53: after the initial deployment.
55: The application should also be able to record cross-references to the
56: bug database. To begin with at least it's reasonable for this to be
57: handled manually.
59: This project should be a routine web/database application; there is
60: nothing particularly unusual about it from that standpoint. The part
61: that becomes somewhat less trivial is making all the data flows work:
62: for example, it is probably necessary to coordinate an improvement in
63: the way bulk build results are tagged by platform. It is also
64: necessary to avoid importing the reports that appear occasionally on
65: pkgsrc-bulk from misconfigured pbulk installs.
67: Note also that "OS" and "machine type" are not the only variables that
68: can affect build outcome. There are also multiple compilers on some
69: platforms, for which the results should be tracked separately, plus
70: other factors such as non-default installation paths. Part of the
71: planning phase for this project should be to identify all the
72: variables of this type that should be tracked.
74: Also remember that what constitutes a "package" is somewhat slippery
75: as well. The pkgsrc directory for a package is not a unique key;
76: multiversion packages, such as Python and Ruby extensions, generate
77: multiple results from a single package directory. There are also a few
78: packages where for whatever reason the package name does not match the
79: pkgsrc directory. The best key seems to be the pkgsrc directory paired
80: with the package-name-without-version.
1.3 ! dholland 81:
! 82: Some code already exists for this, written in Python using Postgres.
! 83: Writing new code (rather than working on this existing code) is
! 84: probably not a good plan.
1.1 dholland 85: """
CVSweb for NetBSD wikisrc <wikimaster@NetBSD.org> software: FreeBSD-CVSweb